@cyrilli_romanum Plus if you read the Canon Law...
@cyrilli_romanum Plus if you read the Canon Law thesis of McKenzie on the delict of heresy, you might be surprised as well.
May 10, 2019
@SedePriest @schmitt4545 @AgborD And how does Paul...
@SedePriest @schmitt4545 @AgborD And how does Paul IV not go against it? Because in the interpration of Billuart an… https://t.co/SjRY3bcPMO
Abbé Damien Dutertre on Twitter
@SedePriest @schmitt4545 @AgborD And how does Paul IV not go against it? Because in the interpration of Billuart and Passerini (and I never found otherwise) obedience by all is technical term for obedience ceremony of cardinals, and once accepted by all Church, you don't go backward.
@SedePriest @schmitt4545 @AgborD And c) canonist...
@SedePriest @schmitt4545 @AgborD And c) canonist explicitely writes (in black and white in book) that Cum ex bull «… https://t.co/aFZAj8jyXk
Abbé Damien Dutertre on Twitter
@SedePriest @schmitt4545 @AgborD And c) canonist explicitely writes (in black and white in book) that Cum ex bull " non amplius viget " (is not in force anymore).
@SedePriest @schmitt4545 @AgborD The Paul IV bull...
@SedePriest @schmitt4545 @AgborD The Paul IV bull does not go against it, first of all. Then, secondly, a) C. 188 i… https://t.co/1giFJOW00V
Abbé Damien Dutertre on Twitter
@SedePriest @schmitt4545 @AgborD The Paul IV bull does not go against it, first of all. Then, secondly, a) C. 188 is tacit resignation (no longer classified as a penalty, as in Cum ex). That is substantial change of law. B) Canon law explicitely says penalties are redone by new code.
@cyrilli_romanum « ... until then he retains...
@cyrilli_romanum « ... until then he retains jurisdiction, not by right, as if he still were pontiff, but by fact,… https://t.co/P0aZZxvove
Abbé Damien Dutertre on Twitter
@cyrilli_romanum " ... until then he retains jurisdiction, not by right, as if he still were pontiff, but by fact, God willing it thus et disposing it for the common good of the Church. " End.