@mlbenson @englishtradcat And we have the avowal...
@mlbenson @englishtradcat And we have the avowal of Bugnini (fm) who did it.
December 06, 2019
Collection d'études théologiques, canoniques, liturgiques et historiques antimodernistes
@mlbenson @englishtradcat And we have the avowal of Bugnini (fm) who did it.
December 06, 2019
@mlbenson @englishtradcat It is a definition, there is no doubt about it. It is set in order to introduce the big p… https://t.co/wgGGZTFOrO
December 06, 2019
Abbé Damien Dutertre on Twitter
@mlbenson @englishtradcat It is a definition, there is no doubt about it. It is set in order to introduce the big parts constituting the mass.
@mlbenson @englishtradcat And if really nothing was wrong, why did they change the definition in the following edition?
December 06, 2019
@mlbenson @englishtradcat Cardinal Ottaviani, former head of the Holy Office, was convinced of it. He said that « i… https://t.co/DFto6Bkz2y
December 06, 2019
Abbé Damien Dutertre on Twitter
@mlbenson @englishtradcat Cardinal Ottaviani, former head of the Holy Office, was convinced of it. He said that " in many points every possibility of satisfying the most modernistic of Protestants.
@mlbenson @englishtradcat Not to mention that some protestants accept the word « sacrifice » in the etymological se… https://t.co/fd0BenY8ne
December 04, 2019
Abbé Damien Dutertre on Twitter
@mlbenson @englishtradcat Not to mention that some protestants accept the word " sacrifice " in the etymological sense, as well as oblation etc, in the sense that the " people of God " being gathered is " sacrum factum ", made holy. This is why to define the mass first as a gathering changes everything.