@seniorasinus Concerning Cum Ex, in addition, it...
@seniorasinus Concerning Cum Ex, in addition, it is clear (and you can check Hergenrhoter about it) that it is a pe… https://t.co/Io32tbNpRx
May 17, 2019
Abbé Damien Dutertre on Twitter
@seniorasinus Concerning Cum Ex, in addition, it is clear (and you can check Hergenrhoter about it) that it is a penalty. In the code, that has been changed into a tacit renouciation (C. 188). That is substantial mutation of law. Thus to go back to Cum Ex doesn't make sense to begin with, C.