Abbé Damien Dutertre on Twitter

@warmcover @LukeDashjr So the whole Church acted in good faith, until it knew better by some absolute sign? That is exactly the point of Billuart: declaration of the Church, which is both a sure sign and legal decision. With Vatican II we got the absolute sign, but not the legal consequence.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1127203282710081537

Abbé Damien Dutertre on Twitter

@englishtradcat @warmcover @LukeDashjr Franzelin thinks that during the great western schism, jurisdiction was supplied in the three obediences, at least for confessions.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1127202657217777665

Abbé Damien Dutertre on Twitter

@englishtradcat @warmcover @LukeDashjr Now, someone might answer: this explanation would work not only with the Thesis, but also with totalism. There could then indeed also be things supplied by Christ. But that is exactly what is denied by the totalists, afaik.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1127202391139524610

Abbé Damien Dutertre on Twitter

@englishtradcat @warmcover @LukeDashjr Before that, even if non pope, if we apply Billuart's theory, it makes sense that the Church still followed him. No?

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1127201502060261377

Abbé Damien Dutertre on Twitter

@englishtradcat @warmcover @LukeDashjr Now, in our case, we got an infallible and absolute sign of P6's non papacy when promulgating Vatican II. And this is precisely when people stopped following him as the rule of faith, and as the true vicar of Christ.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1127201278084427776